工具 / Reply.io
Reply.io
Reply.io 是一个销售互动平台,可运行组合冷邮件、自动化 LinkedIn 操作、电话和短信的多渠道序列,并提供 B2B 联系人数据库和 AI SDR 智能体。
LinkedIn 自动化多渠道线索信息补全 综合: #7 按工具类型: #7 团队 / 代理机构: #7
87.4综合评分
覆盖率 83%
覆盖率 83%
优势与局限
优势(来自事实)
- 在同一序列构建器中设置邮件和 LinkedIn 步骤
- 内置邮箱查找与验证
- 面向 AI 智能体的官方 MCP 服务器
- 公开 API 和 Webhook
局限(来自事实)
- 已知事实未触发任何项
评分明细
安全与账号健康
93.6
覆盖率 40%
多渠道与数据质量
95.5
覆盖率 100%
价格与性价比
63.9
覆盖率 100%
AI 与开发者就绪度
100.0
覆盖率 100%
口碑
80.0
覆盖率 100%
免费版 / 试用
70.0
覆盖率 100%
事实
此处仅显示已核实的事实。未知事实在 API 中逐项列出。 来源备注以英文原文引用。
LinkedIn 自动化
| 主页访问 | 是View Profile is one of nine automatic LinkedIn step types. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 关注 | 是Follow Profile is an automatic step type. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 动态点赞 | 是Like Recent Posts is an automatic step type. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 连接请求 | 是Connect is an automatic step type (note up to 300 characters). | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 消息 | 是Message is an automatic step type (1st-degree connections only). Voice and AI voice messages are also supported. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| InMail | 是InMail is an automatic step type; requires a Sales Navigator subscription with InMail credits. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 技能认可 | 是Endorse Skills is an automatic step type. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 条件(if/else)步骤 | 是Connection acceptance and InMail status (Accepted/Rejected) can be used to branch a sequence; conditional sequences use Condition steps. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| Sales Navigator 导入 | 是The Chrome extension (Findy) reads Sales Navigator search results and saved lead lists and saves contacts into Reply. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
多渠道
| 邮件序列 | 是Live reply.io pricing page blocks automated fetching (403); read from Wayback snapshot dated 2026-09-29. Email automation is included in all Sales Outreach plans. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 同一序列中的邮件 + LinkedIn | 原生(同一序列)LinkedIn runs as a channel inside sequences alongside email, with shared stopping rules. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 统一收件箱 | 是The consolidated Inbox covers automatic and manual emails and LinkedIn messages from all sequences. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
获客与数据
| 邮箱查找 | 是The extension works out likely addresses and verifies them, labeling results Valid/Risky/Catch all/Invalid. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 邮箱验证 | 是Validation assigns Valid/Risky/Invalid and consumes email validation credits (paid add-on, from $20/month per the pricing page). | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| B2B 数据库(联系人) | 1,000,000,000Live reply.io pricing page blocks automated fetching (403); read from Wayback snapshot dated 2026-09-29. 'Access 1+ billion global contacts' / 'live data from 1 billion B2B contacts'. | 厂商宣称 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
安全与账号健康
| 随机延迟 | 是Dynamic limit ranges: Reply picks a random daily count from the configured range 'to look natural'. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 每日操作上限 | 是Per-account daily caps per action type: dynamic range or static number, adjustable up to 100. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 自动撤回待处理邀请 | 是The 'Revoke connection requests' setting auto-revokes requests still unaccepted after a configurable 1-180 days (default 7). | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
定价
| 公开价格 | 是Live reply.io pricing page blocks automated fetching (403); read from Wayback snapshot dated 2026-09-29. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 计价单位 | 按用户Live reply.io pricing page blocks automated fetching (403); read from Wayback snapshot dated 2026-09-29. Plans are priced per user per month. LinkedIn automation is included at 1 account per user on Multichannel, otherwise a $69/mo per-account add-on. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 价格,1 个账号(USD/月) | $99Live reply.io pricing page blocks automated fetching (403); read from Wayback snapshot dated 2026-09-29. Cheapest plan with LinkedIn automation: Multichannel, $99/user/mo billed monthly ($89 billed annually), 1 LinkedIn account per user included. LinkedIn is 'only available with a paid subscription' (not in trial). The alternative, Email Volume 1,000 contacts at $59 plus the $69 LinkedIn add-on, costs $128. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 价格,5 个账号(USD/月) | $404Live reply.io pricing page blocks automated fetching (403); read from Wayback snapshot dated 2026-09-29. Cheapest monthly-billed option: Email Volume (1,000 active contacts) at $59 for 1 user, plus 5 x $69 LinkedIn add-on = $404/mo. Billed annually: $49 + 5 x $69 = $394/mo. Multichannel: 5 users x $99 = $495/mo ($445 annual). This assumes one user may hold 5 add-on LinkedIn accounts; the pricing page lists the add-on as '$69/month per account'. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 免费使用 | 免费试用Live reply.io pricing page blocks automated fetching (403); read from Wayback snapshot dated 2026-09-29. The current pricing page and FAQ advertise a 14-day free trial. An older help article (Wayback 2025-02-07, https://web.archive.org/web/20250207174946id_/https://support.reply.io/en/articles/7943027-free-plan-in-reply) describes a forever-free plan that cannot launch sequences; its current status is not confirmed. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| 试用天数 | 14Live reply.io pricing page blocks automated fetching (403); read from Wayback snapshot dated 2026-09-29. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
开发者与 AI
| REST API | 是Public REST API (docs.reply.io): 15,000 calls per 30 days per team member. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| OpenAPI 规范 | 是Bundled OpenAPI spec linked under 'OpenAPI Specs' in https://docs.reply.io/llms.txt | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| Webhook | 是Two webhook generations (legacy V2 and current V3), managed in Settings or via the API. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| MCP 服务器 | 官方(远程)MCP server at agents.reply.io/mcp; authentication by bearer API key or OAuth. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| Zapier / Make | 是Zapier app with triggers and actions, plus a Zapier step inside sequences. Make and n8n are also supported. | 官方文档 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
口碑
| G2 用户评分 | 4.6Live page returned HTTP 403 (curl and WebFetch, 2026-10-15); read from Wayback snapshot dated 2026-06-11 (visible 'X out of 5 stars' and 'N reviews' header). | 第三方 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| G2 评价数 | 1543Live page returned HTTP 403 (curl and WebFetch, 2026-10-15); read from Wayback snapshot dated 2026-06-11. | 第三方 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| Trustpilot 用户评分 | 4.6TrustScore 4.6 ('Excellent') as of 2026-10-15; star alt text says 4.5. | 第三方 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
| Trustpilot 评价数 | 268As of 2026-10-15. | 第三方 | 来源 2026-10-15 |
对比工具
Reply.io vs lemlist Reply.io vs MeetAlfred Reply.io vs HeyReach Reply.io vs La Growth Machine
综合排名中的相邻工具。全部工具。按使用场景查看 LinkedIn 自动化工具推荐。